A Former DEA and DOJ Attorney on Your Side

Strategic, Principled Advocacy in DEA Regulatory Defense and Vaccine Injury Compensation Law

A DEA enforcement action or a serious vaccine injury can upend everything you have built. Jani Law PLLC can help you navigate both with the depth of experience that only comes from practicing them from the inside.

DEA Regulatory Defense & Vaccine Injury Compensation

Practiced from the inside. Now entirely on your side.

When you face a DEA enforcement action, the government has already spent months building its record. When you pursue a vaccine injury claim, the government’s trial attorneys are waiting on the other side. Whether it is a DEA investigation, an Order to Show Cause, an Immediate Suspension Order, or a claim in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), you are up against specialized attorneys who handle these exact cases every day.

Jani Law PLLC levels that playing field.

Dhairya Jani has practiced at every level of the DEA enforcement and National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program cases his clients now face: as a federal judicial law clerk inside the decision-making chamber, as a DOJ Trial Attorney litigating vaccine injury cases, and as DEA Diversion Enforcement Counsel from first investigation through final agency order. He knows how the government builds its cases, how it evaluates risk, and what it takes to move the decision-makers.

Jani

Two Practice Areas. Both Requiring Knowledge Built From the Inside.

A DEA enforcement action puts your registration, your livelihood, and your reputation at risk. A vaccine injury puts your health and your future on the line. In both, you deserve the caliber of representation that only comes from someone who has practiced these proceedings from the inside.

DEA Defense

DEA Regulatory Defense and Investigations

A DEA investigation or enforcement action does not arrive with time to get organized. An Order to Show Cause starts a 30-day clock the moment it is served. An Immediate Suspension Order takes effect on the spot. For every registrant, whether a physician, pharmacist, distributor, or manufacturer, the administrative process is fast, adversarial, and unforgiving to those who are not ready for it. Jani Law PLLC provides representation from the first DEA contact through final resolution.

Vaccine Injury

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP)

Every National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program case, whether it proceeds to a contested hearing or resolves in settlement, involves DOJ Trial Attorneys who practice exclusively at the Vaccine Court. Individuals and families need counsel who has practiced inside the Program and at the Vaccine Court, who understands how Special Masters evaluate evidence, how the government assesses litigative risk, and what preparation actually looks like at the level these cases require. That is what Jani Law PLLC brings to every case.

DEA Defense

DEA Regulatory Defense and Investigations

A DEA investigation or enforcement action does not arrive with time to get organized. An Order to Show Cause starts a 30-day clock the moment it is served. An Immediate Suspension Order takes effect on the spot. For every registrant, whether a physician, pharmacist, distributor, or manufacturer, the administrative process is fast, adversarial, and unforgiving to those who are not ready for it. Jani Law PLLC provides representation from the first DEA contact through final resolution.

Vaccine Injury

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP)

Every National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program case, whether it proceeds to a contested hearing or resolves in settlement, involves DOJ Trial Attorneys who practice exclusively at the Vaccine Court. Individuals and families need counsel who has practiced inside the Program and at the Vaccine Court, who understands how Special Masters evaluate evidence, how the government assesses litigative risk, and what preparation actually looks like at the level these cases require. That is what Jani Law PLLC brings to every case.

Dhairya Jani

About Dhairya Jani: Former DEA Diversion Enforcement Counsel. Former DOJ Trial Attorney.

Dhairya Jani founded Jani Law PLLC to represent healthcare practitioners, pharmacies, distributors, manufacturers, and other DEA-regulated businesses, as well as vaccine-injured individuals, in two areas of federal law where the government arrives fully prepared and experience is the only equalizer. His legal background is distinct: years spent inside DEA enforcement and the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, practicing both from every angle.

How We Work. What You Can Expect.

At Jani Law PLLC, you will be heard, taken seriously, and represented by counsel who understands exactly what is at stake. We bring three perspectives together in one practice: the adjudicator’s perspective, the government litigator’s perspective, and the enforcement counsel’s perspective.

We Start on Day One.

By the time you call, the government is already prepared. DEA enforcement actions are built over months before a registrant receives anything official. The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has dedicated DOJ Trial Attorneys who practice these cases exclusively. That is why preparation at Jani Law PLLC starts the moment you call. The earlier we start, the stronger your position at every stage that follows.

Every Case Begins With a Conversation.

Every case begins with a conversation, not a document. Whether you are facing a DEA enforcement action or pursuing a vaccine injury claim, the groundwork we lay in the earliest stages shapes every outcome that follows. Before we act, we listen. Before we file, we understand. The questions we ask at the outset are what make the difference.

Principled Advocacy. Every Time.

You will be taken seriously here. We listen without judgment, explain without condescension, and advocate without noise. Respect is not softness. It is the foundation of trust and the basis of credible, effective representation. How you show up in these cases matters. We never forget that.

The Difference Is in the Details.

Understanding the facts is only the beginning. Our role is to take everything your case involves and build it into an argument that is impossible to ignore: in a negotiation, before an Administrative Law Judge, before a Special Master, or on appeal. Our clients do not need noise. They need advocacy that makes the facts unavoidable.

In It for the Long Haul.

Every matter at Jani Law PLLC is handled with sustained focus and intensity. You will always know what is happening, what comes next, and what it means for your case. This firm stays fully engaged from the first call through the final resolution.

What Clients And Colleagues Say About Jani Law PLLC

Jani Law PLLC represents DEA registrants facing federal enforcement actions and individuals pursuing compensation for a vaccine injury. We hope you take the time to read their stories and how Jani Law PLLC has made a difference in their cases.

default bg

Essential Information on DEA Enforcement Actions and Vaccine Injury Compensation

Dhairya Jani has worked on federal cases from initial filing to appeal. He has seen precisely how cases succeed and where the pressure points in settlement negotiations actually lie.

DEA enforcement defense and vaccine injury compensation claims are complex, unfamiliar territory. Understanding what a DEA investigation entails, how to respond to an Order to Show Cause or an Immediate Suspension Order, and what the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program requires can make all the difference.

Jani Law PLLC can answer your questions and help you understand what comes next.

The VICP covers injuries caused by vaccines recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for routine administration to children, pregnant women, or adults that are subject to the federal excise tax.

  • If your injury appears on the Vaccine Injury Table with the right vaccine and onset window, causation is presumed by law.
  • If it does not, an off-table claim requires proving causation through the VICP’s legal standard.

Either way, the VICP was designed to compensate individuals who have suffered a vaccine injury, and many conditions that do not appear on the Table have been compensated.

The only way to know whether your specific injury may be compensable is a careful evaluation of what happened, when it happened, and what your vaccination history shows. That is where the initial consultation at Jani Law PLLC starts.

The Vaccine Injury Table is a federal list of specific injuries paired with specific vaccines and onset windows. When your injury, vaccine, and timing match the Table criteria, causation is presumed by law. You do not need to prove the vaccine caused your injury.

An Order to Show Cause is the formal document that initiates DEA administrative proceedings to revoke an existing DEA registration or deny a pending DEA registration application. It sets out the government’s factual and legal basis for the action and starts a strict 30-day clock within which the registrant must request a hearing before a DEA Administrative Law Judge. If that window closes without a timely hearing request, all allegations in the OSC are treated as true and the DEA may move forward without a hearing.

By the time an OSC is served, the DEA’s investigation has typically been underway for months. The government’s record is already substantially built. Yours needs to be built to the same standard, starting the moment you receive it.

Call a DEA regulatory defense attorney today, not this week. The 30-day deadline to request a hearing before a DEA Administrative Law Judge runs from the date the OSC was served. If that window closes without a timely hearing request, all allegations are treated as true and the DEA may move forward without a hearing.

Yes. If you do not request a hearing within 30 days of being served with an Order to Show Cause, all allegations are deemed admitted by operation of law. The DEA Administrator may then revoke your registration without any further process. No hearing. No opportunity to present your side of the record.

This is one of the most consequential deadlines in federal administrative law. Missing it is not a procedural technicality. It ends the case.